Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ARI W.-N. T. (Anonymous). Westchester County Department of Social Services, respondent. Angela T. (Anonymous), appellant.
Appeal by the mother from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Westchester County (Maryanne Scattaretico Naber, J.), entered June 12, 2015. The order, after a dispositional hearing, terminated the mother's parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the maternal aunt for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In 2008, the subject child was placed with her maternal aunt pursuant to Family Court Act § 1055. In 2010, the Westchester County Department of Social Services (hereinafter the agency) filed a petition to terminate the mother's parental rights. In 2012, after a hearing, a finding of permanent neglect was made against the mother. Thereafter, a dispositional hearing was held, but the mother's attorney passed away before the hearing could be concluded. A de novo dispositional hearing was conducted in 2013 and 2014, at which the agency presented evidence that the mother failed to comply with the court-ordered services and counseling required in order for reunification to occur. The Family Court determined that it was in the child's best interests to remain with her aunt for the purpose of adoption, and accordingly terminated the mother's parental rights. The mother appeals.
Giving deference to the Family Court's credibility determinations (see Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 173), the record supports a finding that the mother failed to comply with the requirements necessary for reunification (see Matter of Christyn Ann D., 26 AD3d 491). In addition, there was evidence here that the child had bonded strongly with her maternal aunt, with whom she had resided for approximately five years (see Matter of “Baby Boy” E., 42 AD3d 536). Accordingly, the evidence at the hearing established that the child's best interests would be served by terminating the mother's parental rights and freeing the child for adoption by her aunt (see Family Ct Act § 631; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147; Matter of William E.P. [Monasha A.B .], 137 AD3d 918).
The mother's remaining contention regarding due process is without merit (see Matter of Vanessa F., 9 AD3d 464).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 18, 2017
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)