Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: TERRY LAWS, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Calendar Date: September 20, 2016
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with unauthorized exchange and possession of gang-related material after a correction officer observed petitioner pass something to a fellow inmate which, following a frisk of both inmates, proved to be informational materials regarding membership in a specified gang. At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of both charges and, other than a modification of the penalty imposed, that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, gang-related material and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Canty v. Prack, 122 AD3d 1054, 1054 [2014]; Matter of Kimbrough v. Fischer, 96 AD3d 1256, 1257 [2012]; Matter of James v. Poole, 52 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 710 [2008] ). Although petitioner and the other inmate involved denied that petitioner passed anything when they shook hands, the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report testified that he saw the other inmate place something in his right front pocket after the handshake, which is where the gang-related material was found during the frisk. In any event, any conflicts or inconsistencies in the testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Canty v. Prack, 122 AD3d at 1055; Matter of Gioe v. Selsky, 269 A.D.2d 644, 645 [2000] ). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.
McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Devine and Aarons, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 522443
Decided: November 10, 2016
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)