Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: XIOMARA D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, et al., respondents; Faith D. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1). In the Matter of Imani O.D. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, et al., respondents; Faith D. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2).
Appeal from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Ilana Gruebel, J.), dated May 28, 2015. The order, after a dispositional hearing, in effect, terminated the mother's parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and St. Vincent's Services for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbusements.
The subject children have been in foster care since August 2009 based upon allegations of neglect by the mother. In August 2012, proceedings were commenced to terminate the mother's parental rights with respect to the subject children. In August 2013, a finding of permanent neglect with respect to the subject children was entered upon the mother's consent. Following a dispositional hearing in May 2015, the Family Court, in effect, terminated the mother's parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and St. Vincent's Services for the purpose of adoption. The mother appeals.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the Family Court properly terminated her parental rights. “Termination of parental rights will free the children for adoption, providing them with the opportunity to have a permanent family” (Matter of Anthony R. [Juliann A.], 90 AD3d 1055, 1056–1057; see Matter of Zechariah J. [Valnick J.], 84 AD3d 1087, 1088). In light of the fact that the subject children had bonded with their foster mother, with whom they had resided for at least six years and who wished to adopt them, and the fact that the mother had no plan for the subject children's future, the court properly determined that the best interests of the children would be served by terminating the mother's parental rights and freeing them for adoption (see Matter of Corey S. [Angel S.], 112 AD3d 641, 642; Matter of Anthony R. [Julian J.], 90 AD3d at 1056–1057; Matter of “Baby Boy” E., 42 AD3d 536, 536–537; Matter of Juanita F., 291 A.D.2d 496).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 13, 2016
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)