Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Martin DASKAL, etc., appellant, v. Joseph TYRNAUER, also known as Volvi Tyrnauer, et al., respondents.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 USC § 1962[c], [d] ), the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), dated October 22, 2012, as granted those branches of the motion of the defendants Joseph Tyrnauer, also known as Volvi Tyrnauer, WNT Construction Corp., WTC Development Corp., WTC Construction Co., Inc ., WTC Management Inc., Home@Greene NY, Inc., WT Development Corp., WT Construction Corp., and 101–115 Spring Garden St., LLC, the separate motion of the defendant Elie Staub, and the separate motion of the defendants Banco Popular North America and Gregory Miedrzynski which were pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the first and second causes of action insofar as asserted against each of them.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The Supreme Court properly concluded that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 USC § 1962[c]; hereinafter RICO) (see 18 USC §§ 1961, 1962[c]; H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 492 U.S. 229; Sedima, S.P .R.L. v. Imrex Co., Inc., 473 U.S. 479; Greenstone/Fontana Corp. v. Feldstein, 72 AD3d 890, 894–895). Further, the plaintiff's failure to state a cause of action pursuant to 18 USC § 1962(c) also warrants the conclusion that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action pursuant to 18 USC § 1962(d), alleging a RICO conspiracy (see Grafstein v. Schwartz, 78 AD3d 772, 773; Greenstone/Fontana Corp. v. Feldstein, 72 AD3d at 894–895).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the of the motion of the defendants Joseph Tyrnauer, also known as Volvi Tyrnauer, WNT Construction Corp., WTC Development Corp., WTC Construction Co., Inc., WTC Management Inc., Home@Greene NY, Inc., WT Development Corp., WT Construction Corp., and 101–115 Spring Garden St., LLC, the separate motion of the defendant Elie Staub, and the separate motion of the defendants Banco Popular North America and Gregory Miedrzynski which were to dismiss the first and second causes of action insofar as asserted against each of them.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 03, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)