Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Monet Cindy Adams, appellant, v. Administration for Children's Services–Queens, et al., respondents.
Submitted—October 27, 2014
DECISION & ORDER
Angella S. Hull, Jamaica, N.Y., attorney for the children.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Margaret P. McGowan, J.), dated June 12, 2013. The order dismissed with prejudice the paternal great aunt's petitions for custody of the subject children.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The only concern at a dispositional hearing following a finding of permanent neglect is the best interests of the child (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147; Matter of Violetta K. v. Mary K., 306 A.D.2d 480, 481; Matter of Giselle H., 22 AD3d 578, 580; Matter of Tenisha Tishonda T., 302 A.D.2d 534, 535). At this juncture, a nonparent relative takes no precedence for custody over the adoptive parents selected by an authorized agency (see Matter of Peter L., 59 N.Y.2d 513, 520; Matter of Violetta K. v. Mary K., 306 A.D.2d at 481).
Here, the record supports the Family Court's determination that the subject children's best interests required continuing custody with the foster care agency so that they could be made available for adoption by their foster parents (see Matter of Amber B., 50 AD3d 1028, 1029; Matter of Chastity Imani Mc., 66 AD3d 782, 783). Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the custody petitions of the children's paternal great aunt.
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2013–06933 (Docket Nos. V–23762–11, V–23763–11, V–3955–12)
Decided: November 19, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)