Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Magelena Lemus, also known as Maria Magdalena Lemus, appellant.
Argued—September 4, 2014
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of Supreme Court, Queens County (Zayas, J.), rendered June 23, 2011, convicting her of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Grosso, J.), of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and a statement made by the defendant to law enforcement officials.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress a gun and a quantity of cocaine recovered from the vehicle occupied by the defendant, money recovered from the wallet of the codefendant Benito Miranda–Hernandez, and the statement made by the defendant to law enforcement officials, are granted, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings consistent with CPL 160.50.
As the People correctly concede, the defendant's judgment of conviction must be reversed, based upon this Court's reversal of the codefendant's conviction in People v. Miranda–Hernandez (106 AD3d 838). The defendant's arrest resulted from the same facts that resulted in the improper arrest of her codefendant.
SKELOS, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2011–06557 (Ind.No. 3003 /09)
Decided: October 15, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)