Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Orlando Vega, appellant, v. Luz Martos Vega, respondent, Marvin Suitt, respondent- respondent.
Submitted—March 7, 2014
DECISION & ORDER
In a custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Posner, J.), dated May 28, 2013, which, without a hearing, granted the application of the respondent Marvin Suitt to dismiss the proceeding.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The subject child was born to the respondent Luz Martos Vega (hereinafter the mother) while the mother was married to the petitioner. The respondent Marvin Suitt commenced a paternity proceeding alleging that he is the father, in which the petitioner had a full and fair opportunity to present evidence. In that proceeding, the petitioner failed to appear before the court and failed to submit to genetic marker testing, and the court found the petitioner to be in default. After a hearing, in which the court found that the presumption of legitimacy was rebutted, Suitt was declared to be the father of the subject child. The petitioner subsequently commenced the instant custody proceeding, seeking custody of the subject child.
The Family Court properly granted Suitt's application to dismiss this proceeding. A nonparent may have standing to seek custody of a child in the event of extraordinary circumstances, such as abandonment, persistent neglect, or unfitness by the parents (see Matter of Bennett v. Jeffreys, 40 N.Y.2d 543, 545). Here, however, the petitioner made no allegation of extraordinary circumstances, and the prior determination as to paternity precludes him from claiming that he is a parent (see Matter of Marquis B. v. Alexis H., 110 AD3d 790). Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the proceeding, without a hearing, for lack of standing (see Matter of Goodale v. Nash, 36 AD3d 703).
We have not considered materials submitted or factual allegations made by the petitioner that are dehors the record (see Matter of Gowda v. Reddy, 105 AD3d 957; Mendoza v. Plaza Homes, LLC, 55 AD3d 692).
The mother's remaining contention is without merit.
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, SGROI and LASALLE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2013–05830 (Docket No. V–891–13)
Decided: September 24, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)