Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Saurio RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
During a search of petitioner's cell, a correction officer found a letter to petitioner requesting that he contact another inmate's mother to set up a drug transaction. Upon being interviewed, petitioner confirmed that the letter was about smuggling drugs into the correctional facility. Consequently, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in an unauthorized exchange, possessing drugs, smuggling, exchanging personal identification numbers and violating facility correspondence procedures. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, confiscated letter and testimony adduced at the hearing provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Moore v. Fischer, 63 AD3d 1401, 1401 [2009]; Matter of Reed v. Goord, 16 AD3d 796, 796 [2005] ). Petitioner's denial of the charges presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Jones v. Prack, 114 AD3d 985, 985 [2014]; Matter of Ferrer v. Prack, 107 AD3d 1254 [2013] ). Furthermore, even though no drugs were actually recovered, a violation of the rules occurred when petitioner conspired to smuggle drugs into the facility (see 7 NYCRR 270.3[b][2]; Matter of Booker v. Fischer, 102 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2013]; Matter of Brown v. Fischer, 98 AD3d 778, 779 [2012] ). In view of the foregoing, and given that petitioner's remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: August 07, 2014
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)