Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Travis G. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Carmen M. (anonymous), appellant.
Submitted—March 18, 2014
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b and Family Court Act article 6 to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), dated January 24, 2013, which, upon a decision of the same court, made after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, determined that she permanently neglected the subject child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the subject child to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption. The notice of appeal from the decision is deemed to be a notice of appeal from the order of fact-finding and disposition (see CPLR 5512[a] ).
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing evidence that the mother permanently neglected the subject child by failing, for one year following the child's placement into foster care, to plan for his return (see Matter of Todd Andre'D. [Kenyetta L.], 88 AD3d 876; Matter of Kendra D. [Amanda D.], 81 AD3d 644; Matter of Wesley F., 190 A.D.2d 576; Matter of Gregory Michael M., 167 A.D.2d 469, 470–471; Matter of June Y., 128 A.D.2d 538). The record establishes that the petitioner made diligent efforts to help the mother comply with her service plan, which required her to submit to a mental health evaluation, to complete psychotherapy, to complete a parenting skills training program, and to maintain regular visits with the child. At the time the instant petition was filed, the mother still had not completed psychotherapy and had not maintained regular visitation with the child. The court properly determined that termination of the mother's parental rights was in the child's best interest (see Matter of Todd Andre'D. [Kenyetta L.], 88 AD3d 876; Matter of Kendra D. [Amanda D.], 81 AD3d at 644; Matter of Shawna DD., 289 A.D.2d 892, 894; Matter of Kenneth A., 206 A.D.2d 602, 604).
Contrary to the mother's contention, she was afforded the effective assistance of counsel in the Family Court (see Matter of Darrell W. [Tenika C.], 110 AD3d 1088; Matter of Dylan Mc. [Michelle M. Mc.], 105 AD3d 1049; Matter of Christiana C. [Carleton C.], 86 AD3d 606).
DILLON, J.P., HALL, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2013–02324 (Docket No. B–19889–12)
Decided: May 28, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)