People of State of New York, respondent, v. Paul Davis, appellant. (2014)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

People of State of New York, respondent, v. Paul Davis, appellant.

2012–09892

Decided: March 26, 2014

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P. MARK C. DILLON JOHN M. LEVENTHAL COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

John F. Ryan, White Plains, N.Y. (David B. Weisfuse of counsel), for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Steven A. Bender and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Submitted—February 13, 2014

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), dated September 4, 2012, as, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant contends that the County Court improperly assessed 15 points under risk factor one for the infliction of physical injury upon the victim during the commission of the subject crimes. However, we agree with the County Court that the People proved by clear and convincing evidence that the underlying crimes caused substantial pain to the victim so as to warrant the assignment of those points. In light of our determination, the defendant's remaining contentions have been rendered academic.

Accordingly, the County Court properly designated the defendant a level three sex offender under Correction Law article 6–C.

MASTRO, J.P., DILLON, LEVENTHAL and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network