Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Madeline Gayle, appellant, v. Patrick W. Davis, respondent.
Submitted—December 16, 2013
DECISION & ORDER
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Klein, J.), dated April 15, 2013, which, upon denying the father's objections to an order of the same court (Braxton, S.M.), dated February 27, 2013, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed the father to pay 35% of the college loan expenses for the parties' daughter, among other things, determined that the Support Magistrate's order only directed the father to pay 35% of the college loan expenses for the fall 2012 semester, with leave to the petitioner to petition for the daughter's future college expenses.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the father was obligated to pay 35% of the parties' daughter's college loan expenses for the fall 2012 semester only, with leave to the mother to petition regarding the daughter's future college expenses and any credits thereto (see Domestic Relations Law § 240[1– b] [c] [7]; see generally Matter of Thompson v Malcolm, 71 AD3d 1154, 1154–1155; Matter of Niewiadomski v. Jacoby, 61 AD3d 871, 872; Matter of French v. French, 13 AD3d 624, 625; Chan v. Chan, 267 A.D.2d 413, 414).
The mother's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2013–05170 (Docket No. F–5997–12)
Decided: February 13, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)