Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. George McCrory, appellant.
Submitted—January 16, 2014
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lorenzo, J.), entered September 28, 2010, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court (Perone, J.) rendered April 19, 2001, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the indictment is jurisdictionally defective because it failed to provide him with sufficient notice of the accusations against him. However, the defendant is barred from raising this claim in his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, as sufficient facts appear on the record to have permitted adequate review of this claim upon direct appeal from the underlying judgment, but the defendant unjustifiably failed to perfect his appeal from that judgment (see CPL 440.10[2][c]; People v. Cuadrado, 9 NY3d 362, 365; People v. Schafer, 94 AD3d 778, 779; People v. Kwok, 51 AD3d 814). In this regard, we note that the defendant's direct appeal was dismissed as abandoned in a decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 28, 2005.
In any event, the alleged defects in the indictment are not jurisdictional and, thus, any challenge to the sufficiency of the factual allegations in the indictment was waived by the defendant's plea of guilty (see People v. Iannone, 45 N.Y.2d 589, 600; People v. Cooper, 88 AD3d 1009, 1011).
Accordingly, the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 was properly denied.
MASTRO, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–00657 (Ind.No. 99–01316)
Decided: February 13, 2014
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)