Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Celso L. Castillo, petitioner, v. John B. Latella, etc., respondent.
DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, John B. Latella, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to determine the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate a judgment of conviction of the same court rendered October 22, 1998, in a criminal action entitled People v. Castillo, commenced in that court under Indictment Nos. 734/97 and 1482/97, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). Here, the petitioner seeks mandamus to compel the respondent to determine the petitioner's motion pursuant to CPL article 440 to vacate a judgment of conviction rendered in an underlying criminal action. In an order dated November 25, 2013, the respondent determined the motion. Hence, we deny the petition as academic, and dismiss the proceeding.
SKELOS, J.P., DILLON, DICKERSON and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2013–09681
Decided: December 26, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)