The People, etc., respondent, v. Quandell Williams, appellant. (2013)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Quandell Williams, appellant.

2012–01272 (Ind.No. 7616 /11)

Decided: December 26, 2013

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J. WILLIAM F. MASTRO L. PRISCILLA HALL SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Monique Ferrell of counsel; Clara Cho on the memorandum of law), for respondent.

Submitted—October 25, 2013

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mondo, J.), imposed January 10, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v. Stokes, 109 AD3d 1016, 1017).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network