Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jill Meyer, etc., appellant, v. Forest Hills Hospital, etc., et al., respondents.
Submitted—October 28, 2013
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of Forest Hills Hospital denying the petitioner's application for clinical privileges, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), dated November 14, 2011, as granted that branch of the motion of Forest Hills Hospital and the Board of Trustees of Forest Hills Hospital which was to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The petitioner's application for clinical privileges at the respondent Forest Hills Hospital was denied by the respondent Board of Trustees of Forest Hills Hospital. A physician who, like the petitioner, seeks to challenge the denial of clinical privileges must first file a complaint with the Public Health Council (hereinafter PHC) (see Public Health Law § 2801–b; Gelbard v. Genesee Hosp., 87 N.Y.2d 691, 695–697; Guibor v Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 46 N.Y.2d 736, 738). It is undisputed that the petitioner failed to file a complaint with the PHC before commencing the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding. Contrary to the petitioner's contention, no exceptions apply that would allow her to avoid this procedural step. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the respondents' motion which was to dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and properly, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding (see Indemini v. Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 4 NY3d 63, 66; Eden v St. Luke's–Roosevelt Hosp. Ctr., 39 AD3d 215, 216; Matter of Ireh v. Nassau Univ. Med. Ctr., 33 AD3d 702, 703; Matter of Capote v Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 168 A.D.2d 238; Matter of Libby [Long Is. Jewish–Hillside Med. Ctr.], 163 A.D.2d 388).
SKELOS, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2012–03330 (Index No. 5072 /11)
Decided: December 18, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)