The People, etc., respondent, v. Khalid Rauf, appellant. (2013)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Khalid Rauf, appellant.

2012–07218 (Ind.No. 3278 /11)

Decided: September 25, 2013

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J. MARK C. DILLON CHERYL E. CHAMBERS LEONARD B. AUSTIN, JJ.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Rona I. Kugler of counsel; Jonathan Yi on the memorandum), for respondent.

Submitted—July 26, 2013

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), imposed July 19, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248; cf. People v. Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive.

ENG, P.J., DILLON, CHAMBERS and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network