Suk Cho Kim, appellant, v. Eun Jung Kim, respondent. (2013)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Suk Cho Kim, appellant, v. Eun Jung Kim, respondent.

2013–00587 (Index No. 15362 /10)

Decided: July 31, 2013

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P. RUTH C. BALKIN JOHN M. LEVENTHAL JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.

Law Offices of Howard B. Felcher, PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Alexander M. Warshow of counsel), for appellant. Carway and Flipse, Mineola, N.Y. (Adrienne Flipse Hausch and Daniel S. Gerson of counsel), for respondent.

Argued—June 20, 2013

DECISION & ORDER

Adewole Agbayewa, Fresh Meadows, N.Y., attorney for the children.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Jackman–Brown, J.), dated January 3, 2013, which denied his motion, in effect, to compel disclosure of all underlying data, empirical test results, records, and notes utilized by a court-appointed forensic evaluator in preparing a report dated October 6, 2011.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the particular circumstances presented here, the plaintiff failed to establish his entitlement to the relief sought (see CPLR article 31).

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and COHEN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network