Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michel TOLIVER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF NYS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a prison disciplinary determination rendered upon two misbehavior reports. The first report alleged that petitioner had refused a direct order to end his shower; the second report stemmed from his continued uncooperative behavior upon returning to his cell and charged him with refusing a direct order, creating a disturbance, interfering with an employee and committing a movement regulation violation. Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal.
We confirm. The misbehavior reports, hearing testimony and video of the incidents provide substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Amaker v. Bezio, 98 AD3d 1146, 1146 [2012]; Matter of Brown v. Goord, 17 AD3d 952, 952 [2005] ), and petitioner's retaliation defense presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Brown v. Goord, 17 AD3d at 952). The Hearing Officer imposed a permissible penalty and, contrary to petitioner's assertion, he was not entitled to credit toward his administrative penalty for the period of time that he was confined prior to the hearing (see Matter of Mastropietro v. New York State Dept. of Corrections, 52 AD3d 1125, 1126 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 711 [2008] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to lack merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 20, 2013
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)