Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Phillip Kuslansky, etc., respondent, v. Kuslansky, Robbins, Stechel and Cunningham, LLP, et al., appellants.
Submitted—March 19, 2013
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.), entered November 4, 2011, which denied the motion of nonparty Cardiac Imaging Leasing, LLC, inter alia, to vacate a restraining notice issued pursuant to CPLR 5222, which restrained its bank account at JP Morgan Chase.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
In June 2011, the Supreme Court entered judgment against the defendants and in favor of the plaintiff in the total sum of $823,946.54. In July 2011, the plaintiff served a restraining notice pursuant to CPLR 5222 upon JP Morgan Chase (hereinafter Chase), seeking to restrain the funds held in an account maintained by nonparty Cardiac Imaging Leasing, LLC (hereinafter Cardiac Imaging). Cardiac Imaging moved, inter alia, to vacate the restraint on its account, contending, among other things, that the funds were not subject to restraint because it was not a judgment debtor, as it was a legal entity separate from the individual defendants. The Supreme Court denied the motion.
Cardiac Imaging, the real party in interest on this appeal, is not a party to this appeal. The defendants, who acknowledge that Cardiac Imaging is a separate legal entity, are not aggrieved by the order appealed from. Accordingly, their appeal must be dismissed (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Commercial Bank of Informatics & Computing Technique Dev. Bank Informtechnika v Ostashko, 274 A.D.2d 516).
DILLON, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, AUSTIN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2012–03713 (Index No. 18147 /05)
Decided: June 12, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)