Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Jose C. Garcia, appellant.
Submitted—April 23, 2013
DECISION & ORDER
Appeals by the defendant from (1) a resentence of the County Court, Orange County (Freehill, J.), imposed May 6, 2010, pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738), upon his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree under Indictment No. 536/04, upon a jury verdict, which sentence was originally imposed April 14, 2005, and (2) a resentence of the same court, also imposed May 6, 2010, pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643), upon his convictions of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) under Indictment No. 594/04, upon a jury verdict, which sentence also was originally imposed April 14, 2005.
ORDERED that the resentences are reversed, on the law, and the matters are remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.
As the People correctly concede, the County Court should have entered initial Drug Law Reform Act (hereinafter DLRA) orders specifying the determinate sentences it would impose prior to imposing the resentences, and should have advised the defendant of his right to appeal from the initial DLRA orders in accordance with the procedures set forth in the DLRA of 2004 and the DLRA of 2005 (see People v. Anderson, 85 AD3d 1043; People v. Struss, 79 AD3d 773, 775; People v. Love, 46 AD3d 919, 920–921). Accordingly, the resentences must be reversed, and the matters must be remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for entry of the initial DLRA orders specifying proposed resentences and informing the defendant that, unless he withdraws his motion or appeals from the initial DLRA orders, the County Court will enter orders vacating the sentences originally imposed and imposing the proposed resentences (see People v. Struss, 79 AD3d at 775–776).
ENG, P.J., DILLON, DICKERSON and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–04994 2010–04995 (Ind.Nos. 04–00536, 04–00594)
Decided: June 05, 2013
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)