IN RE: Bert WOHL (2013)

IN RE: Bert WOHL, etc., petitioner-respondent, v. Ernest FEQUIERE, respondent, Lourdes Marie Dorce, appellant.

Decided: March 20, 2013

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, JOHN M. LEVENTHAL and SANDRA L. SGROI, JJ.

K.C. Okoli, P.C., New York, N.Y., for appellant. Wohl & Fruchter LLP, New York, N.Y. (Ethan D. Wohl of counsel), for petitioner-respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 881 for a license to enter and make improvements to certain real property owned by Ernest Fequiere and Lourdes Marie Dorce, Lourdes Marie Dorce appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated August 3, 2010, which, after a hearing, in effect, denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of damages allegedly resulting from the petitioner's entry upon the subject real property pursuant to an order of the same court granting the requested license.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There is no basis to disturb the hearing court's determination that the appellant failed to establish any damages resulting from the petitioner's entry upon the appellant's real property pursuant to an order granting the petitioner a license to enter and make improvements to that real property (see generally Melius v. Breslin, 46 AD3d 524, 525; Lelekakis v. Kamamis, 41 AD3d 662, 664).

The appellant's remaining contentions are not properly before this Court.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network