Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose E. YOUNG, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (McKeighan, J.), rendered March 18, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree.
Defendant was charged in a single-count indictment with promoting prison contraband in the first degree and, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, thereafter pleaded guilty to attempted promoting prison contraband in the first degree, a class E felony (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 110.05, 205.25 [2] ). As it was unclear whether defendant would qualify as a second felony offender, the parties agreed that defendant would be sentenced as a first time felony offender to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. County Court imposed the agreed-upon sentence and defendant now appeals.
Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that his plea was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary because County Court failed to advise him that there was no mandatory minimum sentence for a first time felony offender convicted of a class D or class E felony (see Penal Law § 70.00[4] ). However, the record reveals—and defendant acknowledges—that he failed to preserve this issue for appellate review by moving to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (cf. People v. Campbell, 66 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2009]; People v. Kopy, 54 AD3d 441, 441 [2008] ). Further, as there is nothing in the record to suggest that County Court was inclined to impose a lesser sentence (compare People v. Charles, 67 AD3d 698, 699 [2009], lv dismissed 13 NY3d 906 [2009]; People v. Rodriguez, 276 A.D.2d 368, 369 [2000] ), we decline defendant's request to take corrective action as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
EGAN JR., J.
PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN and GARRY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 31, 2013
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)