Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kenneth DAVENPORT, petitioner, v. CITY OF MOUNT VERNON, et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Fire Commissioner of the City of Mount Vernon dated October 20, 2010, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer dated October 4, 2010, made after a hearing, and affirmed the denial of the petitioner's application for supplemental benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207–a(2).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The determination of the Fire Commissioner of the City of Mount Vernon (hereinafter the Commissioner), which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer, and affirmed the denial of the petitioner's application for supplemental benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207–a(2), was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Ridge Rd. Fire Dist. v. Schiano, 16 NY3d 494, 499; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 180–181; Matter of Collins v. Codd, 38 N.Y.2d 269, 270). The record, among other things, contains evidence consisting of the reports of three orthopedic surgeons, each of whom concluded that the petitioner's condition was not caused by an accident that allegedly occurred on November 16, 1994. The Commissioner had the authority to evaluate conflicting medical evidence, and was free to credit evidence based on reports of one set of physicians over that of another set of physicians (see Matter of D'Onofrio v. City of Mount Vernon, 226 A.D.2d 719, 720; Matter of Flynn v. Zaleski, 212 A.D.2d 706).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 13, 2012
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)