Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: James Borkowski, petitioner-respondent, v. Robert Bennett, et al., respondents, Andrew DeStefano, appellant; Pat Bonnano, nonparty-respondent.
Submitted—March 20, 2012
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding, in effect, pursuant to Election Law § 16–102 to invalidate a petition designating Andrew DeStefano as a candidate in a primary election that was held on September 15, 2009, for the nomination of the Republican Party as its candidate for the public office of Putnam County Sheriff on the ground, inter alia, that the candidate did not meet the statutory residency requirements, and pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the Putnam County Board of Elections to remove the name of Andrew DeStefano from the ballot, Andrew DeStefano appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated January 24, 2011, as denied his motion pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130–1.1(c) to impose sanctions upon the petitioner and nonparty Pat Bonnano.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The appellant's motion for the imposition of sanctions was properly denied. In light of, among other things, the appellant's signed and notarized letter dated September 9, 2009, to the Putnam County Board of Elections, in which he stated that he was relocating from Putnam County to New York County and that he was changing his voter registration accordingly, and in which he requested that his name be removed from the relevant ballot, the appellant failed to show that the litigation conduct complained of was frivolous within the meaning of 22 NYCRR 130–1.1.
DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–01092 (Index No. 2702 /09)
Decided: May 01, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)