Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ira L. Gershenson, also known as Ira Gershenson, deceased. Spencer Thomas Gershenson, et al., appellants; Deborah Sue Radice, respondent. (File No.2004–3938/C) Judith Ellen Stone, Merrick, N.Y.,
Submitted—January 12, 2012
DECISION & ORDER
In a probate proceeding in which Spencer Thomas Gershenson and Claudia Grosso petitioned pursuant to SCPA 1420 for the construction of Article Second (B) of the will of Ira L. Gershenson, also known as Ira Gershenson, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated October 14, 2010, which, in effect, denied their motion for summary judgment on their petition and determined that the bequest of a certain retirement account to, among others, the petitioner Spencer Thomas Gershenson, had adeemed.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs payable personally by the petitioners.
Contrary to the petitioners' contention, the Surrogate's Court did not err in finding that the subject bequest was a specific bequest (see EPTL1–2.17; Matter of Powers, 166 A.D.2d 534; Matter of Fitzgerald, 29 A.D.2d 325, 328, affd 23 N.Y.2d 973). Under the circumstances herein, the Surrogate's Court also did not err in determining that the subject bequest had adeemed, by virtue of certain acts taken by the testator subsequent to the execution of the will (see EPTL 3–4.3; Matter of Lucia, 2 AD3d 638; Matter of Powers, 166 A.D.2d at 534).
The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.
The respondent's request for an award of attorney's fees and sanctions is not properly before this Court, insofar as the respondent's request is based upon the filing of the Surrogate's Court petition (see Kohn v. Kohn, 86 AD3d 630; Kane v. Rudansky, 309 A.D.2d 785). Insofar as the respondent seeks fees and sanctions in connection with this appeal, we decline that request (see 22 NYCRR 130–1.1).
FLORIO, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–11055
Decided: February 07, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)