Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Kwane Cephus, appellant.
Argued—January 18, 2012
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McGann, J.), rendered August 13, 2009, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the second degree (two counts), endangering the welfare of a child, and criminal sexual act in the first degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
In this case, the complainant, who was 12 years old at the time of the trial, did not testify. The defendant, who is a cousin of the complainant, contends that certain testimony from the complainant's mother and the investigating detective, in which they recounted the identity of the perpetrator given by the complainant, was inadmissible hearsay and that the admission of such testimony into evidence violated his constitutional rights to due process and confrontation. Any error in admitting this evidence was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt since there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, including, inter alia, three separate confessions by the defendant, and there was no reasonable possibility that the error in admitting the evidence contributed to his conviction (see People v. Rice, 75 N.Y.2d 929, 931; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 237; People v. Rayford, 80 AD3d 780, 781).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–08110 (Ind.No. 2040 /08)
Decided: February 07, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)