Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
People of State of New York, respondent, v. Tracy J. Henry, appellant.
Submitted—January 9, 2012
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated October 28, 2010, as, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
“ ‘A court has the discretion to depart from the presumptive risk level based upon the facts in the record, but a departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted only where ‘there exists an aggravating factor or mitigating factor of a kind, or to a degree, that is otherwise not adequately taken into account by the [Sex Offender Registration Act (hereinafter SORA) ] guidelines' ” (People v. Riley, 85 AD3d 1141, 1141, quoting Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006 ed.]; see Correction Law art 6–C; People v. Cohen, 73 AD3d 1003, 1004; People v. Lyons, 72 AD3d 776). There must be clear and convincing evidence of a special circumstance to warrant an upward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v. Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 120, lv denied NY3d, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op 60595 [2012]; People v. Cohen, 73 AD3d at 1004; People v. Lyons, 72 AD3d at 776).
Here, the underlying crime involved the defendant and another man kidnapping the victim at gunpoint, handcuffing her, and driving her for hours to a remote location where they took turns raping her before holding her for hours longer in captivity until she jumped into a river to escape. Under the circumstances, contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court properly determined that there were aggravating factors not adequately taken into account by the SORA guidelines (see People v. Ray, 86 AD3d 435; People v. Rios, 57 AD3d 501, 502; People v. Miller, 48 AD3d 774, 774–775; People v. Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033, 1034–1035). Upon making such a determination, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the People's application for an upward departure (see People v. Wyatt, 89 AD3d at 123).
RIVERA, J.P., ENG, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–11431
Decided: January 31, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)