Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Doreen D. Gallo, respondent, v. SCG Select Carrier Group, L.P., et al., appellants, et al., defendants.
Submitted—January 4, 2012
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants SCG Select Carrier Group, L.P., Antonio F. Fernando, and Eagle Global Logistics (EGL, Inc.), appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated March 3, 2011, which denied their motion to strike the note of issue and to compel the plaintiff to provide certain disclosure.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendants SCG Select Carrier Group L.P., Antonio F. Fernando, and Eagle Global Logistics (EGL, Inc.), to strike the note of issue and to compel the plaintiff to provide certain disclosure is granted.
The appellants timely moved, inter alia, to strike the note of issue within 20 days of its service (see 22 NYCRR 202.21[e] ), and clearly demonstrated that the plaintiff's certificate of readiness contained misstatements concerning the status of discovery. Since the appellants made a clear showing that discovery was not complete and that the case was not ready for trial, the Supreme Court should have granted their motion to strike the note of issue and to compel the plaintiff to appear for a neurological examination (see 22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; Brown v. Astoria Fed. Sav., 51 AD3d 961, 962; Gregory v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 298 A.D.2d 496, 497; Drapaniotis v. 36–08 33rd St. Corp., 288 A.D.2d 254; Spilky v. TRW, Inc., 225 A.D.2d 539, 540).
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., FLORIO, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–03764 (Index No. 3149 /08)
Decided: January 17, 2012
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)