Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Viktor Gribenko, etc., appellant, v. 1750 Associates, LLC, et al., respondents.
Argued—December 5, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for constructive eviction, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated May 10, 2010, as denied that branch of his motion which was pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against him on the issue of liability as contrary to the weight of the evidence.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
According great deference to the jury's determinations as to witness credibility (see Jean–Louis v. City of New York, 86 AD3d 628, 629; Christ v Law Offs. of William F. Levine & Michael B. Grossman, 72 AD3d 721, 723; Bertelle v. New York City Tr. Auth., 19 AD3d 343), a fair interpretation of the evidence (see Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744, 746; Jean–Louis v. City of New York, 86 AD3d 628; Christ v Law Offs. of William F. Levine & Michael B. Grossman, 72 AD3d at 723; Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134) supports the jury's determination that the plaintiff was not constructively evicted from the demised premises (see Barash v Pennsylvania Term. Real Estate Corp., 26 N.Y.2d 77, 83; Drapaniotis v. 36–08 33rd St. Corp., 48 AD3d 736, 737).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence.
SKELOS, J.P., BELEN, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–06687 (Index No. 30770 /06)
Decided: December 20, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)