Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gina–Marie Reitano, appellant, et al., plaintiff, v. Department of Social Services, respondent.
Submitted—November 4, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81 for the appointment of a guardian for the personal needs and property management of J. (Anonymous), an incapacitated person, coguardian Gina–Marie Reitano appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barros, J.), dated January 11, 2011, as denied that branch of her motion which was for an award of an attorney's fee nunc pro tunc for the preparation of accountings in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In 2002, the appellant, an attorney, and Sydonna J. (Anonymous) were appointed to serve as co-guardians for the personal needs and property management of J. (Anonymous), an incapacitated person. In four orders dated June 24, 2010, the appellant was authorized to withdraw the sums of $6,049.36 for 2003, $3,774.81 for 2004, $4,137.74 for 2005, and $5,897.97 for 2006 from the assets of the incapacitated person as compensation for her services as coguardian. The appellant subsequently moved to be appointed as counsel to herself and Sydonna J. (Anonymous) and for an award of an attorney's fee nunc pro tunc for the preparation of accountings in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellant's motion which was for an award of an attorney's fee nunc pro tunc for the preparation of accountings in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006. In her affidavit in support of the motion, the appellant “failed to meet the threshold burden of establishing that the services she performed were actually legal in nature rather than administrative” (Matter of Marion B., 11 AD3d 222, 223, citing Matter of Passuello, 184 A.D.2d 108, 111; see Matter of Nellie G. [Joyce G.D.], 74 AD3d 1065, 1066; cf. Matter of Swingearn, 59 AD3d 556, 557).
MASTRO, A.P.J., FLORIO, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–02259 (Index No. 109271 /01)
Decided: December 20, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)