Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: County of Putnam, et al., respondents, v. Putnam County Sheriff's Employees Association, Inc., appellant.
Argued—December 2, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award dated June 10, 2010, the Putnam County Sheriff's Employees Association, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated December 8, 2010, which granted the petition and denied its cross motion to confirm the award.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A court may vacate an arbitration award on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his power only where the arbitrator's award violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power (see Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers Union of Am., Local 100, 14 NY3d 119, 123; Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL–CIO, 6 NY3d 332, 336; see Matter of United Fedn. of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, AFL–CIO v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 1 NY3d 72, 79; Matter of Town of Callicoon [Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., Town of Callicoon Unit ], 70 N.Y.2d 907, 909).
As the Supreme Court properly determined, the arbitrator, in effect, revised, modified, and altered the parties' agreement, which was specifically prohibited by the arbitrator's powers defined in the parties' collective bargaining agreement (see CPLR 7511[b][1][iii]; Matter of Good Samaritan Hosp. v 1199 Natl. Health & Human Servs. Empls. Union, 69 AD3d 721, 721–722; Fairview Fire Dist. v Fairview Professional Firefighters Assn., Local 1586, IAFF, AFL–CIO, 143 A.D.2d 727, 728; Matter of Board of Educ. of N. Babylon Union Free School Dist. v North Babylon Teachers' Org., 104 A.D.2d 594, 597). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition to vacate the award and denied the cross motion to confirm the award.
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, LEVENTHAL and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–00309 (Index No. 2294 /10)
Decided: December 20, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)