Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Roxanne M. CARCATERRA, Appellant. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 12, 2010, which ruled, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant worked as a publications manager for a nonprofit association that provides educational resources to computer professionals. When her duties were changed due to restructuring, she became dissatisfied with her position and feared that it would eventually be eliminated or that she would be terminated. As a result, she decided to leave her job under a severance agreement. She filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits, but the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled, among other things, that she was disqualified from receiving them because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.
We affirm. Dissatisfaction with one's job duties (see Matter of Harris [Commissioner of Labor], 71 AD3d 1223, 1224 [2010]; Matter of Paino [Commissioner of Labor], 27 AD3d 820, 820 [2006]] ) or quitting a job in anticipation of discharge (see Matter of Dixon–Weaver [Commissioner of Labor], 67 AD3d 1243, 1244 [2009]; Matter of Ruggerio [Commissioner of Labor], 63 AD3d 1477, 1478 [2009] ) have been held not to constitute good cause for leaving one's employment. Here, claimant's unhappiness with her new job duties and concern over possibly losing her job were the factors motivating her to enter into the severance agreement. Although she stated that she had no choice but to sign the agreement as the employer refused to address her complaints, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Doyle [Commissioner of Labor], 78 AD3d 1417, 1418 [2010]; Matter of DeGennaro [Commissioner of Labor], 68 AD3d 1274, 1275 [2009] ). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 22, 2011
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)