Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jolanda Morales, respondent, v. Galo Pozo, appellant, et al., defendants.
Argued—October 28, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Galo Pozo appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), entered June 15, 2010, as denied that branch of his renewed motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the renewed motion of the defendant Galo Pozo (hereinafter the defendant) which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the plaintiff sufficiently identified, at her deposition, the cause of her accident. She both testified that she tripped due to the presence of some stones in a tree well located on the public sidewalk adjacent to the defendant's property and marked the subject defective area on a photograph of the scene (see Shajahan v. Bokari, 74 AD3d 1174; Melnikov v. 249 Brighton Corp., 72 AD3d 760, 761). Furthermore, while the defendant established his prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating, inter alia, that an adjacent property owner generally has no duty to maintain a public tree well and that he exercised no control over the area (see Vucetovic v. Epsom Downs, Inc., 10 NY3d 517, 521; Vellios v. Green Apple, 84 AD3d 1356; Grier v. 35–63 Realty, Inc., 70 AD3d 772, 773), the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact in opposition to the motion by submitting evidence that the defendant may have made a special use of the tree well and thereby contributed to the creation or exacerbation of the alleged dangerous condition (cf. Holmes v. Town of Oyster Bay, 82 AD3d 1047, 1048; Grier v. 35–63 Realty, Inc., 70 AD3d at 773).
MASTRO, A.P.J., CHAMBERS, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–07344 (Index No. 18672 /05)
Decided: December 06, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)