Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
1911 Richmond Avenue Associates, LLC, appellant, v. G.L.G. Capitol, LLC, et al., respondents.
Argued—November 17, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for breach of two leases, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated April 30, 2010, which, inter alia, granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant J.P. Turner & Co., LLC.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for breach of two leases for the rental of commercial office space. The defendants demonstrated the prima facie entitlement of the defendant J.P. Turner & Co., LLC (hereinafter Turner), to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it by proffering evidence that Turner was not a party to the leases at issue in this case and thus owed no contractual duty to the plaintiff (see Black Car & Livery Ins., Inc. v H & W Brokerage, Inc., 28 AD3d 595, 596; Lipton v. Unumprovident Corp., 10 AD3d 703, 706; Blank v. Noumair, 239 A.D.2d 534). In response, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the signatory tenant entered into the lease as an agent of Turner (see Hampton Living v. Carltun on the Park, 286 A.D.2d 664, 665; c.f. G.K. Alan Assoc. Inc. v. Lazzari, 66 AD3d 830, 833), or whether the plaintiff signed the lease in reliance on the signatory tenant's apparent authority to act on behalf of Turner (see Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 231; ER Holdings, LLC v. 122 W.P.R. Corp., 65 AD3d 1275, 1277). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against Turner.
In light of this determination, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contention.
DILLON, J.P., ENG, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–08523 (Index No. 101002 /07)
Decided: December 06, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)