Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Meng Wai Wang, appellant, v Dailly News, L.P., et al., respondents.
Argued—November 4, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 13, 2011, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On October 13, 2008, at approximately 3:00 A.M., the plaintiff was operating his motor vehicle in the right lane of the Brooklyn-bound side of the Manhattan Bridge. The plaintiff alleged that a truck owned by the defendant Dailly News, L.P., and operated by the defendant Giuseppi Amato, which was traveling in the left lane of the Brooklyn-bound side of the Manhattan Bridge directly adjacent to the plaintiff's vehicle, crossed the line dividing the two lanes of traffic into the right lane, striking the plaintiff's vehicle. After issue was joined and discovery was completed, the plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The Supreme Court denied the motion. We affirm.
The plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by submitting admissible evidence that Amato made an unsafe lane change in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128(a). The burden then shifted to the defendants to raise a triable issue of fact (see Harrison v. Bailey, 79 AD3d 811).
In opposition to the plaintiff's motion, the defendants submitted, inter alia, Amato's affidavit and his deposition testimony, which were sufficient to raise triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff was the party who made an unsafe lane change in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128(a) (see Harrison v. Bailey, 79 AD3d 811).
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
MASTRO, A.P.J., FLORIO, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–06144 (Index No. 152631 /09)
Decided: December 06, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)