Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Maria Calvaruso, appellant, v Hunter Ambulette–Ambulance, Inc., et al., respondents.
Submitted—October 6, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding to set aside a general release executed by the parties on February 26, 2010, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), entered December 16, 2010, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the proceeding is converted into an action to set aside the general release, the notice of petition is deemed to be the summons, and the petition is deemed to be the complaint (see CPLR 103 [c] ); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.
The Supreme Court properly declined to set aside the release entered into by the parties on February 26, 2010. “A party seeking to set aside a release on the ground of fraud bears the burden of establishing ‘a material misrepresentation of fact, made with knowledge of its falsity, with intent to deceive, [and] justifiable reliance and damages' ” (Liling v. Segal, 220 A.D.2d 724, 726, quoting Mergler v. Crystal Props. Assoc., 179 A.D.2d 177, 181). Here, the documentary evidence relied upon by the appellant belies her allegations of fraud and conclusively demonstrates that she does not have a viable cause of action to set aside the release on such grounds (see Leeds, Morelli & Brown, P.C. v Hernandez, 55 AD3d 794, 795).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed this matter.
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–01258 (Index No. 22518 /10)
Decided: November 09, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)