IN RE: Edward M. Walsh (2011)

Argued—September 27, 2011

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16–110(2) to cancel the enrollments of certain individuals in the Conservative Party, the petitioner appeals from a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Miller, J.), dated September 17, 2010, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition and the proceeding.

ORDERED that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Where, as here, the chairperson of the county committee of a political party, or a subcommittee appointed by the chairperson, conducts hearings, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Election Law § 16–110(2), to determine whether certain members of that party are not in sympathy with that party's principles, those members must receive notice of such hearings, in person or by mail, at least two days before the hearing (see Election Law § 16–110[2] ).

Here, the petitioner did not offer sufficient proof that the notices were duly addressed and mailed and, therefore, the petitioner failed to show that the members received the required notice (cf.  Nassau Ins. Co. v. Murray, 46 N.Y.2d 828, 829;  New York & Presbyt.   Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 29 AD3d 547, 547–548;  Residential Holding Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., 286 A.D.2d 679, 680;  Matter of Rodriguez v. Wing, 251 A.D.2d 335, 336;  Clark v Columbian Mut. Life Ins. Co., 221 A.D.2d 227;  City of Yonkers v. Clark & Son, 159 A.D.2d 535).   Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition and the proceeding.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.

FLORIO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, CHAMBERS and LOTT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court