Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Irene Narissi, plaintiff, Teresa Rossiello, respondent, v. Wajid Hussain, et al., appellants, et al., defendants.
Submitted—October 5, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Wajid Hussain and Muhammad Hussain appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F.Rivera, J.), dated January 7, 2011, as denied that branch of their motion which was to strike the action from the trial calendar.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by adding thereto a provision extending the time within which discovery must be completed until February 21, 2011; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and the time to complete discovery is extended until 45 days after service upon the appellants of a copy of this decision and order.
While the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying that branch of the appellants' motion which was to strike the action from the trial calendar, the record reveals that the appellants did not have a sufficient opportunity to conduct a supplemental independent medical examination of the plaintiff Teresa Rossiello after she underwent a second right knee arthroscopy and that the certificate of readiness contained material misstatements of fact (cf. Mateo v. City of New York, 282 A.D.2d 313; Matter of Long Is. Light. Co. v Assessor of Town of Brookhaven, 122 A.D.2d 794; Easley v. Van Dyke, 110 A.D.2d 967). Accordingly, under the particular circumstances of this case, the appellants should have been afforded an additional 45 days within which to complete discovery (see Joseph v. Propst, 306 A.D.2d 246; Ronel–Bennett, Inc. v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 149 A.D.2d 678).
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, CHAMBERS and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–03333 (Index No. 37436 /06)
Decided: October 18, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)