Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jaythan Kendrick, petitioner, v. New York State Department of Correctional Service, etc., et al., respondents.
Submitted—September 20, 2011
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the New York State Department of Correctional Service dated June 3, 2009, as affirmed so much of a determination of a hearing officer dated March 11, 2009, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, as found that the petitioner had violated, inter alia, 7 NYCRR 270.2(B)(14)(iv) by possessing an unauthorized type of medication, and imposed penalties.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the testimony adduced at the Tier III disciplinary hearing, and the “Contraband Drug Testing Directive” regarding narcotics identification kits and the testing procedures for contraband provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer's determination that the petitioner possessed an unauthorized type of medication in violation of 7 NYCRR 270.2(B)(14)(iv) (see Matter of Mills v. Fischer, 85 AD3d 1033; Matter of Maxwell v. Fischer, 74 AD3d 1342, 1343; Matter of Brown v. Selsky, 38 AD3d 657; Matter of Rincon v. Selsky, 28 AD3d 565).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, ENG and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–05002 (Index No. 7944 /09)
Decided: October 18, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)