PEOPLE v. ROSA (2026)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Nathan ROSA, appellant.

2015-03356

Decided: June 24, 2026

BETSY BARROS, J.P., FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

Nathan Rosa, Stormville, NY, appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Keith Dolan of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 9, 2019 (People v. Rosa, 176 AD3d 878), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 15, 2015.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745; People v. Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).

BARROS, J.P., CONNOLLY, IANNACCI and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network