Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kiwan Tavares, etc., et al., appellants, v City of New York, respondent.
Submitted—September 20, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sherman, J.), entered June 16, 2010, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On June 28, 2007, the infant plaintiff, Kiwan Tavares, allegedly was injured in a playground when he fell from a ladder on a jungle gym. The playground was owned by the defendant, City of New York.
The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by offering evidence that it neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of any dangerous conditions on the ladder (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320). In his affidavit submitted in opposition, the plaintiffs' expert relied upon alleged violations of guidelines promulgated by the Consumer Products Safety Commission, “ ‘which are neither mandatory nor intended to be the exclusive standards for playground safety’ ” (Washington v. City of Yonkers, 293 A.D.2d 741, 742, quoting Merson v Syosset Cent. School Dist., 286 A.D.2d 668, 670). Thus, the expert affidavit was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact.
Accordingly, the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly granted.
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, ENG and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–07208 (Index No. 184 /08)
Decided: October 04, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)