Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Richard Salvatierra, appellant, v. Captain Weeden, respondent.
Submitted—September 8, 2011
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Norman R. Bezio, the Director of Special Housing Unit, New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated July 28, 2008, which confirmed a determination of a hearing officer dated May 29, 2008, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating prison disciplinary rule 113.27 (see 7 NYCRR 270.2[B][14][xvii] ), and imposing a penalty.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the hearing testimony, and the documentation presented at the hearing constituted substantial evidence of his guilt (see Matter of Mills v. Fischer, 85 AD3d 1033, 1033; Matter of Anekwe v. Ercole, 74 AD3d 1335; Matter of Lozada v. Selsky, 306 A.D.2d 413).
The hearing officer properly, in effect, denied the petitioner's request to submit sections of a law library handbook into evidence at the hearing (see Matter of Lopez v. Healy, 39 AD3d 978, 978–979).
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report contained the necessary specificity to apprise him of the charges against him so as to enable him to prepare an adequate defense (see Matter of Mills v. Fischer, 85 AD3d at 1033; Matter of Anekwe v. Ercole, 74 AD3d 1335).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, LEVENTHAL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–08046 (Index No. 12441 /08)
Decided: October 04, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)