Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sergio Fuentes, appellant, et al., plaintiffs, v. Alonzo Virgil, defendant, Rosa Martinez, respondent.
Submitted—April 13, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Sergio Fuentes appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated July 9, 2009, as (a) granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Rosa Martinez which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5015, to vacate so much of a judgment of the same court entered January 13, 2009, as, upon an order of the same court dated January 31, 2003, granting his unopposed renewed motion for leave to enter judgment against that defendant on the issue of liability upon her default in appearing or answering, and after an inquest, was in favor of him and against that defendant in the principal sum of $1,613,880.18, and (b) granted the defendant Rosa Martinez leave to file and serve an answer.
ORDERED that the order dated July 9, 2009, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting that branch of the motion of the defendant Rosa Martinez which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 5015, to vacate so much of a judgment entered January 13, 2009, as was in favor of the plaintiff Sergio Fuentes and against her in the principal sum of $1,613,880.18, and in granting Martinez leave to file and serve an answer. Martinez provided a reasonable excuse for her default and demonstrated the existence of a potentially meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a][1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 141; Hodges v. Sidial, 48 AD3d 633; Ray Realty Fulton, Inc. v. Lee, 7 AD3d 772). Moreover, vacatur of the default is consistent with the strong public policy of resolving cases on their merits (see Dimitriadis v Visiting Nurse Serv. of N.Y., 84 AD3d 1150; O'Loughlin v. Delisser, 15 AD3d 372).
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, LEVENTHAL, BELEN and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–10506 (Index No. 17406 /99)
Decided: October 04, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)