Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Martin V.L. (Anonymous), Jr. Edwin Gould Services for Children & Families, petitioners-respondents; Martin L. (Anonymous) Sr., appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Miles V.L. (Anonymous). Edwin Gould Services for Children & Families, petitioners-respondents; Martin L. (Anonymous) Sr., appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)
Submitted—September 19, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b to terminate the mother's parental rights, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of two orders of fact-finding and disposition (one as to each child) of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated July 19, 2010, as, after a fact-finding and dispositional hearing, determined that he was not a father whose consent to the subject children's adoptions was required pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111 and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject children to the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services of the City of New York and Edwin Gould Services for Children and Families, for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the orders of fact-finding and disposition are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly determined that the father's consent to the adoption of the subject children was not required (see Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1][d] ). The father failed to sustain his burden of establishing that he maintained substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the children through the payment of support and either regular visitation or other communication with the children (id.; see Matter of Sharissa G., 51 AD3d 1019, 1020; Matter of Michael D.D.S., 24 AD3d 680; Matter of Kasiem H., 230 A.D.2d 796). The father's incarceration did not absolve him of his responsibility to financially support and maintain regular communication with the children (see Matter of Jayquan J. [Clint J.], 77 AD3d 947; Matter of Kevin A. Jr., 61 AD3d 859; Matter of Sharissa G., 51 AD3d at 1020).
In light of the foregoing, the father's remaining contentions have been rendered academic (see Domestic Relations Law § 111; Matter of Kasiem H., 230 A.D.2d at 797).
RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, HALL and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–08622 2010–08624 (Docket Nos. B–1883–09, B–1885–09)
Decided: October 04, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)