Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kieverett Garner, appellant, v Judith Garner, respondent.
Submitted—May 16, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Seiden, Ct.Atty.Ref.), dated December 1, 2009, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition, in effect, to modify a prior order of custody and visitation dated November 18, 2004, awarding custody of the subject child to the mother and visitation to the father, so as to award him sole custody of the subject child.
ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for a reconstruction hearing with respect to those proceedings conducted in the above-entitled case before Court Attorney Referee Francine Seiden on July 29, 2009, which cannot be transcribed, and thereafter report to this Court with all convenient speed, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim.
The petitioner father contends that the Family Court failed to take the appropriate measures to protect his right to assigned counsel pursuant to Family Court Act § 262(a) (see generally Matter of Casey N., 59 AD3d 625). However, the issue cannot be resolved on the record provided to this Court since it does not contain a transcript for the proceedings held on July 29, 2009. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Family Court, Queens County, for a reconstruction hearing with respect to those proceedings conducted in the above-entitled case before Court Attorney Referee Francine Seiden on July 29, 2009, which cannot be transcribed, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim (see Matter of Hall v. Ladson, 18 AD3d 753; Matter of Olson v. Olson, 8 AD3d 285; accord CPLR 5525[d]; cf. Matter of Remy v. Mitchell, 60 AD3d 860, 860; Matter of Jordal v. Jordal, 193 A.D.2d 1102).
DILLON, J.P., BELEN, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–00528 (Docket No. V–1589–02)
Decided: October 04, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)