Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Clavor Schroeter, petitioner, v. Yonkers City School District, et al., respondents.
Argued—September 6, 2011
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Yonkers City School District dated October 15, 2008, which, after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, found the petitioner guilty of charges of misconduct, insubordination, and incompetence, and terminated his employment.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination that he was guilty of misconduct, insubordination, and incompetence was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Capone v Patchogue–Medford Union Free School Dist., 38 AD3d 770, 771–772; Matter of Truss v Westchester County Health Care Corp., 301 A.D.2d 607, 607–608; Matter of Grossman v. Kralik, 217 A.D.2d 625, 626; Matter of A.J. & Taylor Rest. v New York State Liq. Auth., 214 A.D.2d 727; Matter of Romano v Town Bd. of Town of Colonie, 200 A.D.2d 934). Moreover, the petitioner was not deprived of due process during the course of the administrative hearing (see Matter of A.J. & Taylor Rest. v New York State Liq. Auth., 214 A.D.2d 727; see also Matter of Heisler v. Scappaticci, 81 AD3d 954, 954–955; Matter of Curto v. Cosgrove, 256 A.D.2d 407, 408).
The petitioner's remaining contention is without merit.
DILLON, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, DICKERSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–00848 (Index No. 2844 /09)
Decided: September 27, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)