Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Linda Rosenhauch, petitioner, v. David J. Swarts, et al., respondents.
Submitted—June 14, 2011
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Appeals Board dated May 25, 2010, confirming a determination of an administrative law judge dated August 14, 2009, which, after a hearing, suspended the petitioner's nonresident operating privileges for a period of one year.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
On March 23, 2009, at approximately 11:00 A.M., the petitioner, a resident of the State of New Jersey, was traveling in the right northbound lane of the Saw Mill River Parkway through the City of Yonkers at a rate of approximately 50 mph. Another vehicle, operated by a Ms. Gieroth–Rock, had stalled/stopped or was moving slowly in the same lane of traffic on the roadway ahead of her. Despite the fact that the roadway was straight and level for at least 1/2 to 3/4 miles prior to the point of impact, the petitioner rear-ended Gieroth–Rock's vehicle. Gieroth–Rock died as a result of the accident.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the finding that she violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129(a) by following Gieroth–Rock's vehicle too closely is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Vaeth v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 83 AD3d 460; Matter of Fazzone v. Adduci, 155 A.D.2d 540, 541). The administrative law judge properly relied upon the police accident report, as well as the testimony of the petitioner and the police officer who responded to the accident, in determining that the petitioner was at fault in not taking any evasive action to avoid colliding with Gieroth–Rock's disabled vehicle.
In light of all the circumstances of this case, the imposition of a one-year suspension of the petitioner's nonresident operating privileges was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (see Matter of Kreisler v. New York City Tr. Auth., 2 NY3d 775; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 N.Y.2d 222, 233; Matter of Vaeth v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 83 AD3d 460).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–11164 (Index No. 17787 /10)
Decided: June 28, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)