Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Stefani A. Gallagher, appellant, v. David E. McCurty, respondent.
Submitted—June 9, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeStefano, J.), dated September 3, 2010, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured when, after stopping at a stop sign, she drove into an intersection where her vehicle was struck by a vehicle operated by the defendant. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, alleging negligence. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that the plaintiff's alleged negligence was the sole proximate cause of the accident. The Supreme Court granted the defendant's motion.
The defendant made a prima facie showing of his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting evidence that he entered the intersection with the right-of-way, and that, by failing to yield, the plaintiff violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142(a), which constituted negligence as a matter of law (see Thompson v. Schmitt, 74 AD3d 789; McCain v. Larosa, 41 AD3d 792, 793; Gergis v. Miccio, 39 AD3d 468). As the driver with the right-of-way, the defendant “was entitled to anticipate that the plaintiff would obey traffic laws which required her to yield” (Yelder v. Walters, 64 AD3d 762, 764; see Thompson v. Schmitt, 74 AD3d at 790; Klein v. Crespo, 50 AD3d 745, 745–746). In opposition, the plaintiff's contention that the defendant was traveling at an excessive rate of speed was conclusory and speculative, and, on this record, failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Thompson v. Schmitt, 74 AD3d at 790; Yelder v. Walters, 64 AD3d at 765; McCain v. Larosa, 41 AD3d at 793).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ENG, HALL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–09923 (Index No. 14783 /08)
Decided: June 28, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)