Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Rasheen Mills, petitioner, v. Brian Fischer, etc., respondent.
Submitted—June 3, 2011
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated December 24, 2008, which adopted the recommendation of a hearing officer dated November 18, 2008, made after a Tier III disciplinary hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of the charge of possession of gang related materials.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs or disbursements, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, the hearing testimony, and other documents presented at the hearing provided substantial evidence to support the hearing officer's determination that he was guilty of the charge brought against him (see Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966; People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 140; Matter of Reyes v. Leclaire, 49 AD3d 884). Any credibility issues were resolved by the hearing officer, and we find no basis upon which to disturb the hearing officer's determination (see Matter of Perez v. Wilmot, 67 N.Y.2d 615, 617; Matter of Armstrong v. Phillips, 44 AD3d 759).
The petitioner's contention that he was unable to prepare an adequate defense is without merit. The misbehavior report provided sufficient particulars to allow the petitioner to make an effective response to the charge against him and, consequently, he was not denied due process (see Matter of Lozada v. Selsky, 306 A.D.2d 413).
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, BELEN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–11172 (Index No. 6289 /09)
Decided: June 21, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)