The People, etc., respondent, v. Maurizio Gagliardo, appellant. (2011)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Maurizio Gagliardo, appellant.

2009–01266 (Ind.No. 112 /01)

Decided: June 14, 2011

PETER B. SKELOS, J.P. THOMAS A. DICKERSON L. PRISCILLA HALL LEONARD B. AUSTIN ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Submitted—May 25, 2011

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), imposed January 20, 2009, which, upon his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, imposed a term of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on April 19, 2002.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic.

The sole issue presented on appeal is the defendant's challenge to the legality of the term of postrelease supervision that the County Court imposed at resentencing, pursuant to Correction Law § 601–d. The record indicates that the challenged term of postrelease supervision has expired. Accordingly, the appeal has been rendered academic (see People v. Elmendorf, 83 AD3d 959; cf. People v. Garner, 83 AD3d 862).

SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL, AUSTIN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Matthew G. Kiernan

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network